Vitalik Buterin Backs 'Pluralistic IDs' to Defend Privacy in Digital Identity

Vitalik Buterin Advocates for Pluralistic Digital IDs to Safeguard Online Privacy

As digital identity systems evolve, Ethereum co-founder Vitalik Buterin has raised concerns about the risks of enforcing a single global identity per person. In a recent blog post, he proposed a more “pluralistic” approach that preserves privacy, supports pseudonymity, and ensures equitable access for users worldwide.

The Rise of ZK-Based Digital Identity—and Its Risks

Emerging digital ID platforms, such as World ID, Taiwan’s national ID project, and various EU initiatives, are leveraging zero-knowledge (ZK) proofs to validate identities without exposing personal data. While these technologies promise privacy, Buterin cautioned that they aren’t foolproof.

He acknowledged that ZK wrapping helps address critical concerns like data leaks and surveillance. However, when paired with a rigid one-ID-per-person enforcement, these systems can create new vulnerabilities.

“ZK-wrapped ID still has risks,” Buterin noted, especially when identity becomes singular, permanent, and trackable across platforms.

Why Single IDs Threaten Online Pseudonymity

A core issue Buterin raised is the potential loss of pseudonymity—the ability to maintain distinct, unlinked identities in different online contexts.

“In the real world, pseudonymity generally requires having multiple accounts,” he emphasized.

Under a single ID framework, every action—from social posts to financial transactions—could be tied to one verifiable identity. This erodes user autonomy, exposes individuals to surveillance, and raises censorship or coercion risks from governments, employers, or malicious actors.

Source: Buterin

The Problem with 'Proof of Wealth' as a Gatekeeper

Buterin also criticized the idea of using financial barriers—like staking or proof-of-wealth—as the primary defense against Sybil attacks (where one user creates many fake accounts).

“It excludes those without resources and concentrates control among the rich,” he wrote.

Instead, he proposes an incremental cost model, where creating more identities gets progressively expensive (e.g., cost scales with the square of the number of IDs). This deters abuse while still allowing for flexibility and inclusivity.

What Are Pluralistic IDs?

To balance privacy with accountability, Buterin advocates for a pluralistic identity framework—one where no single entity dominates the issuance or verification of identities.

These systems can function in multiple ways:

• Explicitly: via social-graph models like Circles, which build trust through community interactions.

• Implicitly: by allowing various identity sources (e.g., passports, social accounts, on-chain credentials) to coexist, ensuring that no one system becomes too powerful.

“Pluralistic identity is naturally more error-tolerant,” Buterin explained. It’s especially important for users lacking access to traditional government-issued IDs, such as refugees or stateless persons.

Related: XRP Price Eyes 75% Rally as Whale Accumulation Signals Bullish Momentum

The Future: Blending One-Person-One-ID with Social Graphs

Looking ahead, Buterin envisions a hybrid model—where one-per-person identity tools work in harmony with decentralized, social-graph-based systems.

This approach could allow platforms to verify uniqueness without compromising privacy, and it can help build more inclusive, global identity networks that resist centralization and ID monopolies.

“If any system gets too close to 100% market share, it undermines pseudonymity,” Buterin warned.

Conclusion: Privacy, Equity, and Flexibility Must Coexist

Vitalik Buterin latest insights underline a growing tension in digital identity development: how to ensure trust and uniqueness without sacrificing privacy and freedom. Pluralistic identity systems offer a more resilient and inclusive model, aiming to protect user rights in an increasingly digitized world.

As blockchain-based identity continues to expand, Buterin’s proposal serves as a timely reminder that decentralization isn’t just about technology—it’s about protecting human values in the digital age.

Related: The Trader Who Made $1.5M from $6.8K—And What You Can Learn