A U.S. Bitcoin Reserve: Possible But Not Without Drawbacks

The idea of a U.S. Bitcoin reserve has gained traction in recent months, particularly after U.S. President-elect Donald Trump’s 2024 election campaign, during which he promised to establish a “strategic Bitcoin stockpile.” The concept has sparked discussions both domestically and internationally, but a clear roadmap for its implementation remains elusive.
While many have been vocal about the potential benefits of a Bitcoin reserve, experts say the process, in principle, is relatively straightforward. Tim Ogilvie, the global head of institutional services at Kraken, a leading cryptocurrency exchange, explained that creating a strategic Bitcoin reserve mirrors the process used for managing other national reserves, such as gold at Fort Knox or oil in national stockpiles.
“A sovereign buys Bitcoin and secures it with a qualified custodian. Bitcoin’s digital nature doesn’t change this fundamental principle — commodity reserves require the proper infrastructure and expertise for storage and security,” Ogilvie told Cointelegraph. He pointed out that countries like El Salvador and Bhutan have already shown that setting up such reserves is feasible.
Proof of Feasibility: El Salvador and Bhutan
El Salvador, in 2021, made history by adopting Bitcoin as legal tender, purchasing approximately 200 Bitcoin to start its reserve. As of November 2024, the country holds 5,942 BTC, worth approximately $571.6 million at current market prices. Bhutan, a smaller nation, has been mining Bitcoin since 2019 and holds around 12,206 BTC, having sold 367 coins in November 2024 for about $117.9 million.
These examples illustrate that creating a Bitcoin reserve is technically feasible, and the primary challenges are not market-driven or technical, but logistical in terms of security and storage.
The Case for a Bitcoin Reserve
Several lawmakers and political figures have expressed support for establishing a Bitcoin reserve. U.S. Senator Cynthia Lummis introduced a bill in July 2024 aimed at creating a Bitcoin strategic reserve. In Pennsylvania, legislation has been proposed to allow the state treasury to hold up to 10% of its funds in Bitcoin. Similarly, Polish presidential candidate Sławomir Mentzen has promised to establish a Bitcoin reserve if elected, and Brazil has proposed a bill to create a federal Bitcoin reserve.
Advocates of a Bitcoin reserve argue that such a move could act as a hedge against inflation, potentially reduce national debt through value appreciation, and diversify a country’s asset portfolio. As more countries consider adding Bitcoin to their strategic reserves, the concept continues to gain momentum.
The Drawbacks of a Bitcoin Reserve
While the idea of a Bitcoin reserve comes with several potential benefits, it is not without its drawbacks. One of the main concerns is Bitcoin’s notorious price volatility. The value of Bitcoin can fluctuate dramatically, meaning that the reserve could potentially lose substantial value in a short period, depending on market conditions.
Security is another significant challenge. Storing Bitcoin securely to prevent hacking or theft is crucial. Governments would need to ensure robust infrastructure and protocols for safeguarding the private keys, which are critical to accessing and managing the Bitcoin reserves.
Another potential issue flagged by experts is the concentration of Bitcoin ownership. If a government such as the U.S. were to accumulate large amounts of Bitcoin, it could create a situation where a single entity holds a disproportionate share of the asset. This could raise concerns about market manipulation or the long-term effects of such concentrated control.
Tim Ogilvie believes that, despite these risks, a national Bitcoin reserve could ultimately reinforce Bitcoin’s status as a “premier store of value.” However, others remain wary of the implications of government involvement in cryptocurrency markets.
Government Involvement in Crypto: A Double-Edged Sword
Timothy Cradle, Chief Compliance Officer at blockchain payment service Instarails, expressed caution about the potential downsides of government involvement in cryptocurrency. “Governments haven’t always had great outcomes for the crypto industry,” Cradle said, citing the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC)’s aggressive regulatory actions under the Biden administration, which have resulted in numerous fines and penalties against crypto firms.
Cradle highlighted that if the U.S. government were to hold a substantial Bitcoin reserve, it might take an active interest in influencing the price of Bitcoin. “If the U.S. government holds Bitcoin, then it takes an interest in the price of Bitcoin, which could lead to policies aimed at manipulating the price, either up or down,” he explained. He drew parallels to the U.S. government’s 2022 decision to release 200 million barrels of oil from the Strategic Petroleum Reserve to manage price spikes caused by the Russian invasion of Ukraine. “With a strategic Bitcoin reserve, the president might unilaterally alter the price of Bitcoin in a similar manner,” Cradle speculated.
Furthermore, Cradle raised concerns about how the U.S. government might choose to fill the reserve. If it were to acquire Bitcoin through seizures, as it has in the past, this could create an incentive to conduct more aggressive asset forfeitures. The U.S. government currently holds around 213,297 BTC, valued at over $2 billion, which it has acquired primarily through asset seizures, including from the Silk Road black market takedown in 2013.
Global Bitcoin Reserves: A Growing Trend
Globally, governments hold about 2.2% of Bitcoin’s total supply, or roughly 471,380 BTC, according to CoinGecko. As more countries look to secure Bitcoin as part of their national strategies, the question remains whether the U.S. will take the plunge and create its own Bitcoin reserve.
While the technical feasibility of a U.S. Bitcoin reserve is clear, the political and economic implications are far more complex. The idea of a strategic Bitcoin reserve is gaining traction, but it will require careful consideration of security, volatility, and the broader impacts of government intervention on the crypto market.
Disclaimer: The content on this website is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial or investment advice. We do not endorse any project or product. Readers should conduct their own research and assume full responsibility for their decisions. We are not liable for any loss or damage arising from reliance on the information provided. Crypto investments carry risks.